🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It's Expensive

Based on recent research, typical households pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making average wages must contribute approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add these expenses versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.