🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be slashed by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, saying local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.