🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."